Skip to main content


Welcome, you are visiting CEEMS

CEEMS Profile


CEEMS: The Cincinnati Engineering Enhanced Mathematics and Science Program

Overview:

The Cincinnati Engineering Enhanced Mathematics and Science Program (CEEMS) is led by the University of Cincinnati as the higher education Core Partner in Partnership with fourteen Core Partner school districts: Cincinnati Public Schools, Oak Hills, Princeton, Norwood, Winton Woods, and a Rural STEM Consortium of nine school districts. CEEMS works to meet the growing need for engineering-educated teachers who are equipped to provide learners with opportunities to achieve recently revised Ohio State Science Standards juxtaposed with Universal Skills (21st Century Learning Skills). These standards are centered in "real world application: connections to engineering."


To address this local, regional, state, and evolving national need, CEEMS offers four professional development pathways to teacher preparedness: (1) Masters in Curriculum and Instruction (CI) degree with Engineering Education (MCIEE) specialization; (2) Summer Institute for Teachers (SIT); (3) Education Pathway with Licensure for Engineering (EPLE) majors; and (4) Engineering Education Pathway for Career Changers (EEPCC).

The key to these pathways are eight new courses focusing on engineering and science content, and design and challenge-based pedagogy. Leveraging these courses in combination with existing Course and Curriculum Master's of Education pedagogical courses, CEEMS develops and deploys two pathways for in-service teachers (MICEE degree and SIT with certificate) and three pathways for pre-service teachers (MICEE degree with licensure, dual undergraduate engineering degree with teaching licensure, and teaching licensure for professionals with a STEM undergraduate degree).


Preparation of SIT participants allows them to (1) integrate the materials into the courses they teach and (2) disseminate and provide professional development to their colleagues through a district-level "teacher leaders" dissemination program and a regional annual STEM education conference. With this tiered approach, CEEMS is reaching a total of 1,925 teachers (160 pre-service and 1,765 in-service) over five years. These teachers are impacting more than 38,500 7-12 grade students per year.

The five implementation goals of this engineering-based CEEMS MSP are to: (1) Improve 7-12 student science and mathematics achievement to prepare for and increase interest in the college study of engineering or other STEM careers; (2) Develop mathematics and science teacher knowledge of engineering and the engineering design and challenge-based instruction process through explicit training and classroom implementation support; (3) Recruit engineering undergraduates as science or mathematics teachers through involvement in teaching experiences with younger college students in the schools and through a succinct licensure program; (4) Recruit career changers to science or mathematics teaching through succinct licensure programs; and (5) Build a collaborative sustainable education licensure STEM degree-granting infrastructure positively impacting the entire region.

CEEMS is firmly rooted in current research in the fields of science, mathematics and engineering education. It affords a much-needed opportunity to study how students learn mathematics and science if engineering is used as the context.

The CEEMS research effort uses a mixed method design to respond to the following questions: (1) How do students in a design and challenge-based learning environment engage in decision making, strategic planning, evaluation and revision of plans, creative thinking, and task persistence? (2) How do students in design and challenge-based learning environments perceive their involvement in STEM careers? (3) What measures and instruments are most effective at capturing and documenting these learning tasks? (4) How are the teachers' gains in knowledge of engineering transferred into instructional plans? (5) What supports and barriers do teachers encounter as they implement their plans with students? and (6) How do the knowledge gains and implementation factors impact the teachers' pedagogical content knowledge?

Site Contributions
05/31/18Teachers’ Thoughts on Student Decision Making During Engineering Design Lessons
05/30/18Identifying Initial Conceptions of Engineering and Teaching Engineering
07/27/16Factors That Support Teacher Shift to Engineering Design
07/27/16Student Understanding of the Engineering Design Process Using Challenge Based Learning
10/07/15Peer Instructor or College Faculty - Who is Better for Leading Teacher Professional Development? (Evaluation)
05/27/15A look at the importance of STEM education for future employment
12/05/14Concept Maps for Assessing Teacher Learning and Faculty Professional Development
04/16/14Math Projects Integrate Engineering Design & Artistic Creativity
04/16/14Using Challenge-Based Learning to Teach the Fundamentals of Exponential Equations
09/03/13Teachers hope to motivate with challenge-based learning
08/15/13Training Secondary Math and Science Teachers to Bring an Engineering Perspective to the Classroom
08/15/13CEEMS Closing Day Showcase Promises Classroom Results
06/04/13CEEMS Project Annual Evaluator's Report - 2012
01/29/13Get Real! STEM Conference
12/19/12CEEMS Promotional Video
08/15/12Housing at Earth's Most Incredible Junctures
08/15/12Rocket Forces and Design
08/15/12Design and Testing of Smart Phone Cases
08/15/12Extreme Makeover-Highway Edition
08/15/12How do we keep our planet green?
08/15/12Your Brain on Sports
08/15/12Velocity Can Be Terminal?
08/15/12Population is Off the Chain
08/15/12Earthquake Terror
08/15/12Park Design
08/15/12To Make a Better Product
08/15/12Renewable Energies
08/15/12Supreme Green Cooling
08/12/12Using Math to Build Bridges
08/12/12A Whole New Classroom: Using Geometry to Create the Ideal Learning Space
04/06/12Cincinnati Engineering Enhanced Mathematics and Science Program
03/22/12CEEMS Summer Institute Faculty Course Development Seminars
03/19/12CEEMS MSP Launches STEM Education into 21st Century
01/29/12Accessible STEM Education
01/29/12Using the Engineering Design Process to Develop and Implement a High School Introduction to Engineering Course